Guy, this is hardly a balanced and rational argument. The scheme is designed to REDUCE reliance upon groundwater, so why say that it will lower the water table? How can you justify your statement that the scheme to produce more, high quality drinking water will lead to "more disease, more medical bills, more health industry failures" and even "less nutrition in foods". I'm all for a lively debate about water resources, environmental impact and the issues around resilience of a large, centralised potable water treatment plant in what may increasingly become a hurricane-risk area. However I hope that we can keep the discussions on this forum factual, professional and rational.
Published by Jeremy Biddle, Engineering Director at Bluewater Bio
Guy, this is hardly a balanced and rational argument. The scheme is designed to REDUCE reliance upon groundwater, so why say that it will lower the water table? How can you justify your statement that the scheme to produce more, high quality drinking water will lead to "more disease, more medical bills, more health industry failures" and even "less nutrition in foods". I'm all for a lively debate about water resources, environmental impact and the issues around resilience of a large, centralised potable water treatment plant in what may increasingly become a hurricane-risk area. However I hope that we can keep the discussions on this forum factual, professional and rational.